Re: llvm90 -why

Jan Beich <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.x11
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Jan Beich <[email protected]> writes:

> Vasily Postnicov <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> вс, 22 сент. 2019 г., 13:25 ajtiM via freebsd-x11 <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 12:22:21 +0200
>>> Jan Beich <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > ajtiM via freebsd-x11 <[email protected]> writes:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi!
>>> > >
>>> > > Mesa-dri is updated and needs llvm90. It is okay. But libosmesa
>>> > > needs llvm80. Now I have llvm60, llvm80 and llvm90 and and each one
>>> > > needs a lot of time to build.
>>> > >
>>> > > pkg info -r llvm80
>>> > > llvm80-8.0.1.:
>>> > > libosmesa
>>> >
>>> > I didn't notice, and poudriere doesn't catch such issues.
>>> > Fixed in https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/512572
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>
>> What's worse, lang/clover was not updated and still seems to require
>> llvm80, but devel/libclc now depends on llvm90. This breaks OpenCL on amd
>> cards completely
>
> lang/clover doesn't build with llvm90, see https://reviews.freebsd.org/P294
> I'm relying on users' feedback as the maintainer didn't help test bug 239682.
>
> Can you document OpenCL error for posterity?

Worked around in https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/512594
If you don't want to install more than one devel/llvm* define
DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=llvm=80 in make.conf(5).

Alternatively, help fixing lang/clover to work with llvm90. Mesa ports
are unlikely to be updated until Summer next year due to low demand.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.