[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.x11 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]/bugzilla/> |
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239682 --- Comment #36 from Jan Beich <[email protected]> --- Only Mesa because it will remain stuck on llvm80 for years due to complications with QA and build system. I don't think anything else can affect Gnome. If you find more regressions, please, report. Binary package estimates: /latest around Saturday evening. Delays mainly come from ports r513733 and ports r513734. /quarterly around Sunday morning as previous build hasn't finished yet. (In reply to Brooks Davis from comment #33) Bug noise is a good argument. I'll think of a solution e.g., splitting into many bugs, removing CC after approval, mailing off-bug. "typical pkg set" argument is double-edged, sacrificing many for the few. If LLVM_DEFAULT is too old (e.g., misses some C++20 stuff or has bugs only fixed in later version) it may lead to individual ports hardcoding llvm versions. However, some like Mesa can avoid RUN_DEPENDS by statically linking. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"