Re: drm-legacy-kmod vs. drm-kmod
Greg V <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.x11 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <42bda092-0eab-4841-8eac-4aaa9be1b4ae@localhost> |
Mar 10, 2020 8:04:21 PM Robert Huff <[email protected]>: > > > I have an older machine with an on-board ATI Radeon HD3300. > > > > Have you tried modern radeonkms on it (from drm-kmod not legacy)? > > I have not; existing information strongly suggests that will not > work. Always try everything yourself! It's not that hard. > > > According to the "FreeBSD Graphics Blog" on github, that line > > > (for AMD) is the HD7000 (family) chipset. > > > > "HD7000 family" is kind of a meaningless marketing term: it includes > > TeraScale 2, GCN 1 and GCN 2. > > > > I'm only quoting the blog. :-( > <does further quick research> > Let's assume for the moment I'm talking about the HD7730 and > higher. > This is not about increased hardware performance; the old chip > did just fine for that system. It's about having the hardware to > support the software that's in active development. radeonkms is still supported – so everything R600, from the earliest HD something to the R5 ones, should work. Active *development* is happening on GCN GPUs supported by amdgpu. Keep in mind that our "legacy" port is.. well.. legacy *in terms of porting*. It's manually ported instead of writing a compatibility layer which is how the current port works. The legacy port is stuck on older Linux code because of that, but *Linux did not drop support for older GPUs in the same drivers* so the new port should work just as well. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"