Re: Wayland on FreeBSD
Jan Beich <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.x11,gmane.os.freebsd.questions |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tomasz CEDRO <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:59 AM Greg V wrote: > >> There are no "Linux specific DMA transfers" in userspace >> applications :) DMA-BUF is basically a way to refer to GPU buffers >> from userspace, pass them around as file descriptors, and >> synchronize access to them. Of course it is supported, it's a very >> important part of the DRM stack. > > Hmm, is it then normal to use on non-Linux code like this? > > #include <linux/dma-buf.h> > #include "linux-dmabuf-unstable-v1-client-protocol.h" <linux/dma-buf.h> usage is rare. See other Wayland + DMABUF consumers: https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=zwp_linux_dmabuf_v1+-package:efl https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/search?q=zwp_linux_dmabuf_v1 > Is this some sort of Linux KMS/DRM specification that keeps explict > "linux" name hardcoded and we have them too on FreeBSD named that way? Ask the protocol authors. > Never seen anything like this :-) Not even Video4Linux, BSD sockets or BSD labels? _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"