Re: Wayland on FreeBSD
Frederic Chardon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.questions,gmane.os.freebsd.devel.x11 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMODbkk0pr0cbxKJ51RG2jqEWA+Cg07ZNzO3bdgqoLh2QJDHuA@mail.gmail.com> |
Le lun. 20 avr. 2020 à 23:06, Jan Beich <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Frederic Chardon <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > The trace shows usage of llvmpipe after the failed ioctl on > > /dev/dri/card0, so as I understand the lack of hardware acceleration > > concerns only Xwayland, whereas wayland itself is accelerated ? > > Yep. Check which ioctls fail then try to reproduce outside of Mesa or > hardcode the result. Overriding PCI ID via INTEL_DEVID_OVERRIDE is > unlikely to help e.g., All below failure occurs only in xwayland, X11 and wayland succeed. The first failure is with I915_PARAM_CHIPSET_ID. When I hardcode the correct ID I get a failure with I915_PARAM_HAS_RELAXED_DATA. When I force the result to be true (as with X11 and Wayland), the ioctl DRM_I915_GEM_EXECBUFFER2_WR fails with errno EPERM. Should I open an issue on drm-kms github? Or it is more likely a problem on mesa side? > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2019-January/022551.html > > If you still have no clue try playing with sysctls under compat.linuxkpi > via /boot/loader.conf. Any hints which ones are worth a try? How did you solve your issue (as it seems to be pretty similar). Thanks _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"