Re: Recent libX11 update broke emacs

Kevin Oberman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.x11
Message-ID <CAN6yY1uzjoPvsvxZ8q1QimFj1mNdAuYrZNGme93rtG6VVoE5Cg@mail.gmail.com>
Yes, that fixes the problem. All looks good.

Thanks for the quick fix to both you and Ashish!
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: [email protected]
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683


On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 2:06 AM Niclas Zeising <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On 2020-08-04 06:48, Ashish SHUKLA wrote:
> > On 8/4/20 10:04 AM, Ashish SHUKLA wrote:
> >> On 8/4/20 3:38 AM, Niclas Zeising wrote:
> >>> On 2020-08-03 19:07, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >>>> This is a weird problem and I'm uncertain if it is in libW11,
> > x11-server,
> >>>> or emacs. As a result, I'm crossposting to both lists.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yesterday, after upgrading libX11 and x11-server, I could no longer
> run
> >>>> Emacs to an  X display. It crashed quickly with a segmentation error
> >>>> in the
> >>>> pthread library. Oddly, I could run it to my local xserver from a
> remote
> >>>> system.
> >>>
> >>> Where does the segfault occur before entering pthreads?
> >>>
> >>>> Rolling back the x11 server did not help nor did rolling back libX11
> or
> >>>> even both of them. I had to roll back libX11 first and build the
> server
> >>>> with the old libX11. Rebuilding emacs with the new ports made no
> >>>> difference.
> >>>
> >>> Which version of the server did you build?  The patch to xorg-server is
> >>> trivial, just switching out malloc for calloc have the memory 0
> >>> initialized.  The patch to libX11 is rather more involved.
> >>> It is possible that someone accidentally changed the ABI of libX11, I
> >>> guess.  What happens if you use the version with just the security
> fixes
> >>> (the version I committed first, and that was merged to the Q3 branch.)
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Since the old libX11 contains a very serious vulnerability, I  really
> >>>> hate
> >>>> to leave it this way, but I also have a hard time getting anything
> done
> >>>> without emacs. Nothing other than emacs seems to have a problem with
> > this
> >>>
> >>> There is one commit after libX11 1.6.10, that takes care of a
> regression.
> >>> Can you apply
> >>>
> >
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libx11/-/commit/93fce3f4e79cbc737d6468a4f68ba3de1b83953b
> >>> on top of the libX11 1.6.10 update and see if that fixes anything?
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>
> >> Able to get Emacs to segfault:
> >>
> >> λ lldb -e /usr/local/bin/emacs
> >> (lldb) target create "/usr/local/bin/emacs"
> >> Current executable set to '/usr/local/bin/emacs' (x86_64).
> >> (lldb) run -Q
> >> Process 36196 launching
> >> Process 36196 launched: '/usr/local/bin/emacs' (x86_64)
> >> Process 36196 stopped
> >> * thread #1, name = 'emacs-28.0.50', stop reason = signal SIGSEGV:
> >> invalid address (fault address: 0x0)
> >>      frame #0: 0x0000000000427ca0
> >> emacs`best_xim_style(xim=0x0000000000000000) at xfns.c:2629:21
> >> (lldb) bt
> > [...]
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> And workaround is launching Emacs like: env -u XMODIFIERS emacs
> >>
> >> I'll try the libX11 patch and give it a shot.
> >
> > Emacs, with libX11 built with the patch, works fine now. It seems like
> > it's also reported in Debian[1], and they merged it. Maybe we can do the
> > same ?
> >
> > References:
> > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966691
> >
>
> Thank you, I'll see about adding that patch to the port and package then.
> It looks like this is both a bug in libX11 and to some extent also emacs?
>
> Kevin, can you double check that the patch works for you.  I find it
> strange that you have to rebuild both xorg-server and libX11 for it to
> work, are you forcing static linkage somewhere?
> Regards
> --
> Niclas
>
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.