Re: i915 intel_frontbuffer_put panic, patch for review/testing

Ed Maste <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.x11
Message-ID <CAPyFy2ABRi1=rU5KOtRtWvH+VJJrqGz1SRtp45hNVLCkg3VLfA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 22:39, Pete Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 1/28/21 5:49 PM, Ed Maste wrote:
> >
> > I've backported the patch and applied it against the 5.4-lts branch in
> > the drm-kmod repo, and the issue has not recurred. My patch is in a
> > pull request at [3], and available as a patch file at [4]. Review
> > and/or testing is very much appreciated.
> I would be happy to test on my laptop running 13, is there an easy way
> to download a branch and have it build using the ports infrastructure?

>
>   I believe ports using github for distfiles expect a tag not branch.  i
> can test out building it locally outside of the ports tree, but wanted
> to see if i could be lazy first :)

I hacked the drm-fbsd13-kmod port to build my snapshot; you can use
https://github.com/emaste/freebsd-ports/tree/drm-kmod-issue-49 or just
apply the change
https://github.com/emaste/freebsd-ports/commit/1f54b67ad4b1ef93071f3d285a72f7cd8302a7ab.

It looks like GH_TAGNAME indeed does not expect a branch, but a hash
is permissible.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.