Re: i915 intel_frontbuffer_put panic, patch for review/testing
Pete Wright <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.x11 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/31/21 12:20 PM, Ed Maste wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 22:39, Pete Wright <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 1/28/21 5:49 PM, Ed Maste wrote: >>> I've backported the patch and applied it against the 5.4-lts branch in >>> the drm-kmod repo, and the issue has not recurred. My patch is in a >>> pull request at [3], and available as a patch file at [4]. Review >>> and/or testing is very much appreciated. >> I would be happy to test on my laptop running 13, is there an easy way >> to download a branch and have it build using the ports infrastructure? >> I believe ports using github for distfiles expect a tag not branch. i >> can test out building it locally outside of the ports tree, but wanted >> to see if i could be lazy first :) > I hacked the drm-fbsd13-kmod port to build my snapshot; you can use > https://github.com/emaste/freebsd-ports/tree/drm-kmod-issue-49 or just > apply the change > https://github.com/emaste/freebsd-ports/commit/1f54b67ad4b1ef93071f3d285a72f7cd8302a7ab. > > It looks like GH_TAGNAME indeed does not expect a branch, but a hash > is permissible. Awesome, thanks Ed. An of course it makes sense now about GH_TAGNAME taking a hash since tags are just pointers to a specific hash as I understand git :) Testing now and will report any issues that pop up. -pete -- Pete Wright [email protected] @nomadlogicLA _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"