Re: Old NVIDIA card, new FreeBSD = failure?
Stefan Esser <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.x11 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <85b5b9b3-ad93-e8ac-2e86-b2f277ed7753__30215.0820077927$1624801556$gmane$org@freebsd.org> |
Am 27.06.21 um 13:55 schrieb Robert Huff: > > Greg: > >> > b) I have a very limited budget, and would ideally like to be >> > able to use this on older systems - say ones with a PCIe 2.0 >> > expansion slot. >> >> No conflict here: PCI Express generations are all backward and >> forward compatible. You can run the newest gen4 cards in gen2 >> slots just fine (obviously at gen2 bandwidth). > > As Johnny Carson used to say: "I did not know that." > <inhales; exhales> > So now I'm back to the question: what is the earliest GCN version > actively supported by amdgpu and drm(-kmod/-current-kmod)? More > correctly: where is this documented? I can look it up myself. Hi Robert, I've got a passively cooled R7 250E (Cap Verde Pro) with 2 GB video RAM (probably identical to the GDDR5 version of the Radeon HD 7750). All technical details can be found in Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radeon_HD_7000_series https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radeon_Rx_200_series It is a GCN 1st gen. card and supported by the xf86-video-amdgpu driver and the DRM kmods and libva drivers. I would not get a lower end card, they are neither cheaper nor more power efficient (idle power of 10 W, 50 W max., allowing for a very silent fan or even passive cooling in a case with forced airflow). The HD 7790 is already GCN 2nd gen., but probably harder to get, and at $70 about twice as expensive as a HD 7750 on eBay. All R5 240 and higher cards should work as well (R5 220/230/235 are Terascale cards). The only drawback compared to a modern card is raw performance (but the 7750 is already faster than today's typical on-chip VGAs) and lack of HW decoding of modern video codecs like VP9. Regards, STefan
OpenPGP_signature
(application/pgp-signature, 495 B) - not displayed