[Bug 289174] The need to recognize NetBSD's downstream X.org customization and Xenocara
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.x11 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]/bugzilla/> |
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=289174 --- Comment #7 from [email protected] --- How does NetBSD's X.org repository compare to the one that FreeBSD uses? Aside from FreeBSD uses ports, and NetBSD uses its own git. It may be better if FreeBSD uses the same BSD build system that NetBSD does. I question whether freedesktop wants that. There's also advanced drivers from NetBSD, that FreeBSD can import. EXA for improved 2D acceleration, and the VC4 driver for VideoCoreIV for 2D acceleration for ARM64 (Raspberry Pi). Would these be better upstream, when Linux may already have their drivers upstream? If so NetBSD may have better ones. Also, these NetBSD drivers may be permissive. Is it possible for the three major BSD's plus other BSD's to work together on the same X client repository? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.