[Bug 277365] x11/nvidia-driver: Allow building without syscons(4) support

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.x11
Message-ID <[email protected]/bugzilla/>
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277365

--- Comment #7 from Tomoaki AOKI <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Mark Linimon from comment #6)
> As of 20260519, the patch in Attachment 264238 [details] no longer applies.  I think
it is missing a diff statement?

Strange. Still applicable (with offsets) for main (aka latest) branch of ports
tree at commit ports eed3a463d84a1848f329f6bc800622ad3a2785f2 like below.

# gpatch -p1 -E --verbose --dry-run -i
/root/LocalPatches/x11/nvidia-driver/Bug277365-x11_nvidia-driver_Allow_building_without_syscons_support-v3-splitkmods.diff
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff --git a/x11/nvidia-driver/Makefile b/x11/nvidia-driver/Makefile
|index 1529bf3af8e4..5e4056fd532b 100644
|--- a/x11/nvidia-kmod/Makefile
|+++ b/x11/nvidia-kmod/Makefile
--------------------------
checking file x11/nvidia-kmod/Makefile
Hunk #1 succeeded at 119 (offset 10 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 236 (offset 15 lines).
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- a/graphics/nvidia-drm-kmod/Makefile.common
|+++ b/graphics/nvidia-drm-kmod/Makefile.common
--------------------------
checking file graphics/nvidia-drm-kmod/Makefile.common
Hunk #1 succeeded at 21.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 50 (offset 4 lines).
done
# 


> Also, is this an alternative to the patch in Attachment 248804 [details], or does
it replace it?

It's my proposed alternative with implemented differently.
But there's another PR, Bug 216050 related with this, and I'm still
investigating further.
Anyway, the deadline would be when sc driver is deleted from main branch of
src.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.