Re: unionfs on 5.x patch to test
Dario Freni <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.freesbie |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Matteo Riondato wrote: > Can anyone with a FreeBSD 5.x (5.4 if possible) box try the attached > patch and build and try an ISO? > > It enables unionfs support on the ISO. > > Thanks > Best Regards > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Index: freesbie.defaults.conf > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/freesbie2/conf/freesbie.defaults.conf,v > retrieving revision 1.6 > diff -u -r1.6 freesbie.defaults.conf > --- freesbie.defaults.conf 15 Nov 2005 22:59:42 -0000 1.6 > +++ freesbie.defaults.conf 2 Dec 2005 11:59:56 -0000 > @@ -107,4 +107,8 @@ > # Define NO_UNIONFS if you want to avoid using unionfs in the built > # system > # > -NO_UNIONFS=YES # Unionfs is broken in > 6.0, so disable it by default > +OSREL=`uname -r | cut -c 1` > +if [ $OSREL -eq 6 -o $OSREL -eq 7 ]; then > + NO_UNIONFS=YES # Unionfs is broken in > 6.0, so disable it by default > +fi > + I'd like to focus only on the actual -STABLE branch, in this case 6.0. We learn from FreeSBIE 1 experience how hard and confusing is supporting more than one branch. (one for all, kernel config. Our kernel config is only an example, and a user really should build its own. I don't want 4 kernel config files in the tree) Bye, Dario -- Dario Freni ([email protected]) FreeSBIE developer (http://www.freesbie.org) GPG Public key at http://www.saturnero.net/saturnero.asc -- FreeSBIE mailing list (http://www.freesbie.org)