Re: [CVS Update of freesbie2 - M:0 A:2 R:0]

On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 08:24:54PM +0200, Dario Freni wrote:
> Well, only a writable etc it's required, so etcmfs or unionfs are ok
> with it. Also xconfig plugin need it. It is not that problem.

> Due to its general purpose nature, I think this implementation can be
> considered fine and functional. The only thing that needs to be changed,
> imho, is removing pf_enable="YES" row and using forcestart to start pf.

Well, yes. I was obviously forgetting the fact that pfctl cannot load
rules from the command line.
Please ignore me for the second time today.......

Best Regards
-- 
Matteo Riondato
FreeBSD Committer (http://www.freebsd.org)
G.U.F.I. Staff Member (http://www.gufi.org)
FreeSBIE Developer (http://www.freesbie.org)
-- 
FreeSBIE mailing list (http://www.freesbie.org)