Re: PF + ALTQ - Bandwidth per customer

"Sam Fourman Jr." <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.isp,gmane.os.freebsd.devel.pf4freebsd
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Kahlil Erwin Talledo
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
>>> I had forgotten that dummynet can be used with pf. Maybe i should start this
>>> with a new subject but it is directly related in that I need bandwidth
>>> control again that I don´t have since changing to pf.
>>>
>>>  o- What needs to be patched/done to make them work together
>>>     on Current and Releng?
>>>  o- Are you happier with the combination of dummynet with pf
>>>     than with IPFW?
>>>
>>> DummyNet was one of the reasons that I was slow to leave IPFW.
>>>
>>> Thanks and I am really not trying to hijack this thread, be glad to start a
>>> new one.
>>
>> so you actually can use DummyNet w/ pf to limit bandwidth per ip?
>>
>> is there anyway to say.. ip address x must be used with MAC Address y
>> then follow the per ip bandwidth limit
>> if not then drop all traffic in and out?
>
> you have to remember that mac is layer two and it can be easily spoofed.
>  so doing it that way might not be the best thing to do it. that's just
> my two cents though.

you are absolutely right, after thinking about it a bit more, the
right idea would be to
somehow limit bandwidth per ip or group of ip's(several bound to the
same interface)
any ideas?

Sam Fourman Jr.
Fourman Networks
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.