Re: PPPoE server (high traffic in WDM network)

Michelle Konzack <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.isp
Organization Tamay Dogan Network
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Muhammad,

Am 2009-08-21 16:36:52, schrieb muhammad usman:
> Hi,
> 
> I've little off topic suggestion regarding network design.
> 
> The solution you are implementing will mean to make hundreds of users
> share the same broadcast domain. As all your FTTH and other DSLAMS
> would be working in bridge mode.

Right.

> This scenerio is not safe as if anyone of your clients will start his
> own pppoe server you will be in strange trouble, there can be other
> issues too.

I was thinking about this problem to, but  AFAIK  this  does  not  work,
because the FTTH Modem is blocking such things from the customer.

> I guess your DSLAMs must have built in pppoe support and radius
> client, if its there then every port of dslams can be separate
> broadcast domain. This will cause you extra routing management
> (depending upon your scsnerio)

No, the "Iskratel SI3000 FTTH DSLAM" is only a  transport  system  which
require external PPPoE service.

> In case your DSLAMS have no pppoe feature then i would suggest you to
> at least put every DSLAM's uplink port in deparate VLAN and connect
> pppoe server using trunk port or multiple single ports.

The problem is, HOW many VLANS can you open?  If I use the Transmode TS
DWDM (GE) and/or CWDM (10GE) then I am limited to 4096 VLAN's.

So, if you have inside this network  business  customers  which  require
seperated VLAN routing you run out of VLAN's

Yes, I can use a biger system, but this  cost  at  least  twice  of  the
"Transmode TS" system.  Juniper is much more expensive.

> And before implementing this solution consult your DSLAM vendor cause
> ive observed problems in ipdslams when used in bridge/transperant
> mode.

I am already in contact with Iskratel  in  Kranj/Slovenia,  because  the
Distributor in Germany is a little bit to small for the  Project  and  I
get direct help from there engineers to implement this.

The only difference between is, that my  Servers  are  running  entirely
"Debian GNU/Linux" and where it fit better, FreeBSD.

Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
    Michelle Konzack
    Systemadministrator
    Tamay Dogan Network
    Debian GNU/Linux Consultant

-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
<http://www.tamay-dogan.net/>                 Michelle Konzack
<http://www.can4linux.org/>                   Apt. 917
<http://www.flexray4linux.org/>               50, rue de Soultz
Jabber [email protected]           67100 Strabourg/France
IRC    #Debian (irc.icq.com)                  Tel. DE: +49 177 9351947
ICQ    #328449886                             Tel. FR: +33  6  61925193
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.