Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
Sergey Matveychuk <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.current,gmane.os.freebsd.stable,gmane.os.freebsd.performance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
15.12.2011 17:36, Michael Larabel пишет: > On 12/15/2011 07:25 AM, Stefan Esser wrote: >> Am 15.12.2011 11:10, schrieb Michael Larabel: >>> No, the same hardware was used for each OS. >>> >>> In terms of the software, the stock software stack for each OS was used. >> Just curious: Why did you choose ZFS on FreeBSD, while UFS2 (with >> journaling enabled) should be an obvious choice since it is more similar >> in concept to ext4 and since that is what most FreeBSD users will use >> with FreeBSD? > > I was running some ZFS vs. UFS tests as well and this happened to have > ZFS on when I was running some other tests. > Can we look at the tests? My opinion is ZFS without tuning is much slower than UFS2. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"