Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

Tony McC <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.performance
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:32:48 +0100
"O. Hartmann" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today:
> 
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAyNzA
> 
> It may be worth to discuss the sad performance of FBSD in some parts
> of the benchmark. A difference of a factor 10 or 100 is simply far
> beyond disapointing, it is more than inacceptable and by just reading
> those benchmarks, I'd like to drop thinking of using FreeBSD even as
> a backend server in scientific and business environments. In detail,
> some of the SciMark benches look disappointing. The overall image
> can't help over the fact that in C-Ray FreeBSD is better performing.
> 
> From the compiler, I'd like say there couldn't be a drop of more than
> 10
> - 15% in performance - but not 10 or 100 times.
> 
> I'm just thinking about the discussion of SCHED_ULE and all the saur
> spots we discussed when I stumbled over the test.
> 
> Regards,
> Oliver
> 

I suggest always ignoring benchmarks. They are like reading the
astrology column in a tabloid newspaper.  Instead, try FreeBSD for your
work.  Is it fast enough?  Surely that is all you need to know. FreeBSD
is quite fast enough for my needs and I am simply more productive using
it than when I use any other operating system.  That is partly to do
with my familiarity with my setup, which I have customised the way I
want.  That is something that no benchmark can allow for.

Tony
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.