Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default

2011/12/14 Mike Tancsa <[email protected]>:
> On 12/13/2011 7:01 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone experiencing problems tried to set sysctl kern.sched.steal_thresh=1 ?
>>
>> I don't remember what our specific problem at $WORK was, perhaps it
>> was just interrupt threads not getting serviced fast enough, but we've
>> hard-coded this to 1 and removed the code that sets it in
>> sched_initticks().  The same effect should be had by setting the
>> sysctl after a box is up.
>
> FWIW, this does impact the performance of pbzip2 on an i7. Using a 1.1G file
>
> pbzip2 -v -c big > /dev/null
>
> with burnP6 running in the background,
>
> sysctl kern.sched.steal_thresh=1
> vs
> sysctl kern.sched.steal_thresh=3
>
>
>
>    N           Min           Max        Median           Avg        Stddev
> x  10     38.005022      38.42238     38.194648     38.165052    0.15546188
> +   9     38.695417     40.595544     39.392127     39.435384    0.59814114
> Difference at 95.0% confidence
>        1.27033 +/- 0.412636
>        3.32852% +/- 1.08119%
>        (Student's t, pooled s = 0.425627)
>
> a value of 1 is *slightly* faster.

Hi Mike,
was that just the same codebase with the switch SCHED_4BSD/SCHED_ULE?

Also, the results here should be in the 3% interval for the avg case,
which is not yet at the 'alarm level' but could still be an
indication.
I still suspect I/O plays a big role here, however, thus it could be
detemined by other factors.

Could you retry the bench checking CPU usage and possible thread
migration around for both cases?

Thanks,
Attilio


-- 
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"