Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

"O. Hartmann" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.stable,gmane.os.freebsd.current,gmane.os.freebsd.performance
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am 12/15/11 14:58, schrieb Daniel Kalchev:
> 
> On Dec 15, 2011, at 3:48 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> 
> […]
>> That said: thrown out, data ignored, done.
>>
>> Now what?  Where are we?  We're right back where we were a day or two
>> ago; meaning no closer to solving the dilemma reported by users and
>> SCHED_ULE.  Heck, we're not even sure if there is an issue, other than
>> some folks confirming that SCHED_4BSD performs better for them (that's
>> what started this whole thread), and there are at least a couple which
>> have stated this.
> 
> But, are any of these benchmarks really engaging the 4BSD/ULE scheduler differences? Most such benchmarks are run on a system with no other load whatsoever and in no way represent real world experience.
> 
> What is more, I believe in such benchmarks "the system feels sluggish" is not measured at all. Even if it is measured, if in such case the benchmark finishes "better" - that is, faster, or say, makes the system freeze for the user for the duration of the test -- it will be considered "win", because the benchmark suite ran faster on that particular system -- whereas a system which ran the benchmark fast, provided good interactive response etc would be considered "loser".

I guess you have some proofs on that "feeling"?

> 
> I think it is not good idea to hijack this thread, but instead focusing on the other SCHED_ULE bashing thread to define an reasonable benchmark or a set of benchmarks rather -- so that many would run it and provide feedback.
> 
> 
> Daniel_______________________________________________
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO6jXLAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8eHMH+gIP8qH2klzQvMwrpp40QhU1
E1Bd4Q13P5RAc69oJJWdBzz4jV9Oz9aJZzpc4uHnFI9FyxBVY9LL3QVuX3cErK7u
NmxS6Hl3AkrfAZ2I0O/XGq6LF6Kmcw83LCKWubexRAaIIr4YjZd/AiTd5TlU1nyy
Nml9b8yyJlt9aggS22TO6UTnqRxcvqFQhP8hAZnPjYsoN6sDd3TRynAJqNc7LWeW
P8jBxo2+gqEnNDl4LYrr+RDM6Gsbr3k2+YYK98miX/DUHBLEBx0liVCpy+lPNWhl
XBqGGGPjveUqBEVvUiOixU7aO8rxQDnL3PBSdreL7xeOTvP9bRdZ1lnaxpEq+4M=
=YwYJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.