Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

Chris Rees <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.current,gmane.os.freebsd.stable,gmane.os.freebsd.performance
Message-ID <CADLo83-28ZSaazXzk2st-BZ9rNA1fsryS38fpwRZF_dyq2sxBw@mail.gmail.com> 
On 15 December 2011 17:58, O. Hartmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> Since ZFS in Linux can only be achieved via FUSE (ad far as I know), it
> is legitimate to compare ZFS and ext4. It would be much more competetive
> to compare Linux BTRFS and FreeBSD ZFS.
>


Er... does ext4 guarantee data integrity?

You're not comparing like with like; please do some research on the
point of ZFS before asserting that they're fair comparisons.

A fair(er) comparison could be ext4 with UFS+soft-updates.

Chris
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.