Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
Chris Rees <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.current,gmane.os.freebsd.stable,gmane.os.freebsd.performance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADLo838gdJJUMjC4uv0TKNCOVAjvfCm=uUBA0WRQ7vqLA0AZQQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On 15 Dec 2011 21:25, "Kevin Oberman" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Chris Rees <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 15 December 2011 17:58, O. Hartmann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Since ZFS in Linux can only be achieved via FUSE (ad far as I know), it > >> is legitimate to compare ZFS and ext4. It would be much more competetive > >> to compare Linux BTRFS and FreeBSD ZFS. > >> > > > > > > Er... does ext4 guarantee data integrity? > > > > You're not comparing like with like; please do some research on the > > point of ZFS before asserting that they're fair comparisons. > > > > A fair(er) comparison could be ext4 with UFS+soft-updates. > > Wouldn't UFS+SUJ be the closest atch? Yup. Thanks. Chris _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"