Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default

Daniel Nebdal <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.current,gmane.os.freebsd.performance
Message-ID <CA+t49PLVMSQ4TR0yUOf8D=1bGZWtJ3jxx73E2C-6eLAYVvoZiw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Mike Tancsa <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12/15/2011 11:56 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> So, as very first thing, can you try the following:
>> - Same codebase, etc. etc.
>> - Make the test 4 times, discard the first and ministat for the other 3
>> - Reboot
>> - Change the steal_thresh value
>> - Make the test 4 times, discard the first and ministat for the other 3
>>
>> Then report discarded values and the ministated one and we will have
>> more informations I guess
>> (also, I don't think devfs contention should play a role here, thus
>> nevermind about it for now).
>
>
> Results and data at
>
> http://www.tancsa.com/ule-bsd.html
>
>        ---Mike
>

I took the liberty of re-plotting this as one boxplot per test-type,
in the hope of getting a better overview. R script included. Beware
the y-ranges. (To re-plot with a specific y range, add e.g.
"ylim=c(0,35)" to the boxplot() calls.)

http://nebdal.net/sched/plot.html

-- 
Daniel Nebdal
Dep. of genetics, Oslo University Hospital
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.