Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
Arnaud Lacombe <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.current,gmane.os.freebsd.stable,gmane.os.freebsd.performance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACqU3MU5H-gRNo2+c+ZOWoE5pTd_Gmdo-JdV3oXTpw0z58oM6A@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi, [resend on the ml, my bad] On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Attilio Rao <[email protected]> wrote: > 2011/12/16 Arnaud Lacombe <[email protected]>: >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, O. Hartmann >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today: >>> >>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAyNzA >>> >> it might be worth highlighting that despite Oracle Linux 6.1 Server is >> using a kernel + compiler almost 2 years old, it still manages to >> out-perform the bleeding edge FreeBSD :-) >> >> Now, from what I've read so far in this thread, it seems that a lot of >> people are still in abnegation... >> >> my 0.2c, >> - Arnaud > > Said by someone which really thinks passing __FILE__ and __LINE__ to > kernel function is going to give a mesaurable performance penalty is > really hilarious however :) > You are right, the rest of the kernel's subsystem are so sluggish, fragile and half baked that this would barely improve anything... That will be my last word in this thread. - Arnaud _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"