Re: PostgreSQL user experience: FreeBSD (ZFS) vs OpenIndiana (ZFS) vs Linux (EXT4)

Adam Vande More <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.performance
Message-ID <CA+tpaK3n0RJvuqP5c_A0ekgFqiGa+n1LZ8fo3sNxP2Tbsno+zw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Martin Matuska <[email protected]> wrote:

> I would like to share some of our expreience with PostgreSQL on FreeBSD.
> It has been a while ago since we had to stop using FreeBSD for our
> customer's PostgreSQL servers.
>

I don't claim any expertise in this area so please take this with that in
mind.

A couple of things that might help.

Setting zfs set sync=disabled on fs where the WAL resides(all alone).  Of
course this would help ZFS regardless of OS.

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/wal-intro.html

I've also seen other reports of slow PostgreSQL on FreeBSD, and in that
scenario there were a large amount of gettimeofday(2) calls as the
bottleneck and such calls on FreeBSD are significantly slower.

http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Postgresql-9-0-2-explain-analyze-very-slow-10x-compared-to-actual-query-time-td3336664.html

If you have a faster timecounter, it might help to switch.

-- 
Adam Vande More
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.