Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

"Samuel J. Greear" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.stable,gmane.os.freebsd.performance,gmane.os.freebsd.current
Message-ID <CANY-Wm8DmFxm7xwXfRcyBSu4z6fTOap+y=Mhx+uBP=uJN4g3fw@mail.gmail.com>
http://www.osnews.com/story/25334/DragonFly_BSD_MP_Performance_Significantly_Improved

PostgreSQL tests, see the linked PDF for #'s on FreeBSD, DragonFly, Linux
and Solaris. Steps to reproduce these benchmarks provided.

Sam

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Igor Mozolevsky <[email protected]>wrote:

> Interestingly, while people seem to be (arguably rightly) focused on
> criticising Phoronix's benchmarking, nobody has offered an alternative
> benchmark; and while (again, arguably rightly) it is important to
> benchmark real world performance, equally, nobody has offered any
> numbers in relation to, for example, HTTP or SMTP, or any other "real
> world"-application torture tests done on the aforementioned two
> platforms... IMO, this just goes to show that "doing is hard" and
> "criticising is much easier" (yes, I am aware of the irony involved in
> making this statement, but someone has to!)
>
>
> Cheers,
> Igor M :-)
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
>
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.