Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

Matthew Tippett <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.stable,gmane.os.freebsd.performance,gmane.os.freebsd.current
Message-ID <[email protected]>
For such a system, the greatest immediate value would be to attempt to 
reproduce the benchmarks in question.

Install PTS from www.phoronix-test-suite.com or freshports.org.

Run the benchmark against those used in the article

     phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1112113-AR-ORACLELIN37

You will be asked to push the comparison up to openbenchmarking at the end.

Matthew

On 12/20/2011 01:39 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On 12/20/11 21:20, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
>> Interestingly, while people seem to be (arguably rightly) focused on
>> criticising Phoronix's benchmarking, nobody has offered an alternative
>> benchmark; and while (again, arguably rightly) it is important to
>> benchmark real world performance, equally, nobody has offered any
>> numbers in relation to, for example, HTTP or SMTP, or any other "real
>> world"-application torture tests done on the aforementioned two
>> platforms... IMO, this just goes to show that "doing is hard" and
>> "criticising is much easier" (yes, I am aware of the irony involved in
>> making this statement, but someone has to!)
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Igor M :-)
> Unfortunately, M. Larabel is the only one who's performing benchmarks on
> FreeBSD, comparing its performance to the Linux-opponents. Adn indeed,
> there is a lot of criticism, but no alternative.
> I said unfortunately - not offensive - since Larabel and Phoronix are
> sadly the only ones who do actually such bechmarking.
>
> It would be much more nicer and kind to support those people.
>
> Well, in January/February we get new hardware. One box is supposed to do
> number crunching via 12 cores and a TESLA GPU. My colleague is
> developing a high parallelized peice of software for satellite data
> transformation. The software package is CPU bound, partially GPU, but
> massively memory hungry (96 to 128 GB RAM is needed).
> What I can offer is, since I will also work on that machine and I've
> free hand to administer, in the spare time of doing my PhD, installing
> FreeBSD 9.0/10.0 besides SuSe Linux and looking forward having one ZFS
> data storage drive for homes, so both systems can perform on a most
> recent ZFS. I'm new to Linux, not a BSD guru, nor I'm a professional
> programmer/developer. My skills are sufficient for the daily scientific
> work. So, without pressure, I'm willing to perform some HPC benchmarks
> under advice if the day comes and those interested in bare numbers of
> FreeBSD vs. Linux performance with a real-world-scientific application.
>
> I would appreciate to see some of the developers and/or FreeBSD hackers
> to help Phoronix setting up a proper testenvironment instead of bashing
> M. Larabel and his fellows.
>
> Regards,
> Oliver
>

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.