Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
Garrett Cooper <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.performance,gmane.os.freebsd.stable,gmane.os.freebsd.current |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGH67wR5f4=BEXM7mYmy-i4hiRH8Ev4Ksm6Ga1f3kDzwVO=MLQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:16 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks. >> >> My request for the person documenting the tunings also runs the benchmark to >> ensure expected behaviour. >> > Why should you have to tune anything ? Did you tune the Oracle Server > install ? If not, you should not have to tune the FreeBSD install, > that wouldn't be fair. If you tune FreeBSD, you should tune the Oracle > Server install too. It is pretty easy to win at least 30% in > performance for certain workload by choosing the right kernel > configuration. This assumes that Oracle doesn't do secret sauce tuning... the Vanilla CentOS/RHEL base is probably a better comparison than the Oracle custom distro. Thanks! -Garrett _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"