Re: Tor on FreeBSD Performance issues

 1086 tor      RET   read 1568/0x620
  1086 tor      CALL  clock_gettime(0xd,0x7fffffffd910)
  1086 tor      RET   clock_gettime 0
  1086 tor      CALL  kevent(0x3,0x3e18000,0x2,0x3dbe000,0x400,0x7fffffffd920)
  1086 tor      GIO   fd 3 wrote 64 bytes

1086 tor      RET   kevent 3
  1086 tor      CALL  clock_gettime(0x4,0x7fffffffd940)
  1086 tor      RET   clock_gettime 0
  1086 tor      CALL  gettimeofday(0x7fffffffd930,0)
  1086 tor      RET   gettimeofday 0
  1086 tor      CALL  recvfrom(0xbc2,0x4822020,0x3e40,0,0,0)
  1086 tor      GIO   fd 3010 read 4096 bytes

As I understand kevent to be part of queue I go with yes here. What I also take from it is a huge number of clock_gettime() and gettimeofday() calls.

Julian

Am 08.02.2012 um 17:39 schrieb Adrian Chadd:

> Can you verify that it's properly using kqueue, rather than poll?
> 
> 
> Adrian

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
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=uNbY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----