Re: Improved Intel Turbo Boost status/control

Ivan Klymenko <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.performance,gmane.os.freebsd.current
Message-ID <[email protected]>
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:11:28 +0200
Alexander Motin <[email protected]> пишет:

> On 03/12/12 22:05, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> > В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:55:21 +0200
> > Alexander Motin<[email protected]>  пишет:
> >
> >> On 03/12/12 21:33, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> >>> В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:15:35 +0200
> >>> Alexander Motin<[email protected]>   пишет:
> >>>> I'd like to note that recent r232793 change to cpufreq(4) in HEAD
> >>>> opened simple access to the  Intel Turbo Boost status/control.
> >>>> I've found that at least two of my desktop systems (based
> >>>> Nehalem and SandyBridge Core i7s) with enabled Intel Turbo Boost
> >>>> in BIOS it is not use it by default, unless powerd is enabled.
> >>>> And before this change it was difficult to detect/fix.
> >>>>
> >>>> ACPI reports extra performance level with frequency 1MHz above
> >>>> the nominal to control Intel Turbo Boost operation. It is not a
> >>>> bug, but feature:
> >>>> dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 2934/106000 2933/95000 2800/82000 ...
> >>>> In this case value 2933 means 2.93GHz, but 2934 means 3.2-3.6GHz.
> >>>>
> >>>> After boot with default settings I see:
> >>>> dev.cpu.0.freq: 2933
> >>>> , that means Turbo Boost is disabled.
> >>>>
> >>>> Enabling powerd or just adding to rc.conf
> >>>> performance_cpu_freq="HIGH"
> >>>> enables Turbo Boost and adds extra 10-20% to the system
> >>>> performance.
> >>>>
> >>>> Turbo Boost operation can be monitored in run-time via the PMC
> >>>> with command that prints number or really executed cycles per
> >>>> CPU core: pmcstat -s unhalted-core-cycles -w 1
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Thank you very much!
> >>> performance_cpu_freq="HIGH"
> >>> and as this option must be combined with state of the processor C1
> >>> C2 C3?
> >>> performance_cx_lowest="XX"
> >>> economy_cx_lowest="XX"
> >>
> >> The more CPU cores on package are sleeping and the deeper they are
> >> sleeping, the bigger will be boost for remaining active cores.
> >> Without using deeper C-states boost is usually quite small (about
> >> 100-200MHz for desktop chips). Enabling C-states increases it in
> >> few times.
> >>
> >
> > I have a Core i5 c Turbo Boost technology (enabled in BIOS)
> > After the following:
> > sysctl dev.cpu.0.freq_levels
> > dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 2301/35000 2300/35000 2000/29079 1800/25766
> > 1600/22265 1400/18904 1225/16541 1200/15996 1050/13996 1000/12907
> > 875/11293 800/9956 700/8711 600/7467 500/6222 400/4978 300/3733
> > 200/2489 100/1244
> >
> > performance_cpu_freq="HIGH">>  /etc/rc.conf
> >
> > /etc/rc.d/powerd restart
> >
> > sysctl dev.cpu.0.freq_levels
> > dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 2301/35000 2300/35000 2000/29079 1800/25766
> > 1600/22265 1400/18904 1225/16541 1200/15996 1050/13996 1000/12907
> > 875/11293 800/9956 700/8711 600/7467 500/6222 400/4978 300/3733
> > 200/2489 100/1244
> >
> > CPU frequency does not rise above 2300 Mhz
> >
> > What am I doing wrong?
> 
> performance_cpu_freq variable handled not by /etc/rc.d/powerd, but 
> /etc/rc.d/power_profile.
> 

hm :(

hw.acpi.acline: 1 no change status :(

apparently something is broken with ACPI
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.