Re: vm.kmem_size_max and vm.kmem_size capped at 329853485875 (~307GB)
Alan Cox <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.performance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 08/22/2012 12:09, Gezeala M. Bacuño II wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Alan Cox<[email protected]> wrote: >> On 8/20/2012 8:26 PM, Gezeala M. Bacuño II wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Gezeala M. Bacuño II<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Alan Cox<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On 08/18/2012 19:57, Gezeala M. Bacuño II wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Alan Cox<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> On 08/17/2012 17:08, Gezeala M. Bacuño II wrote: >>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Alan Cox<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> vm.kmem_size controls the maximum size of the kernel's heap, i.e., >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> region where the kernel's slab and malloc()-like memory allocators >>>>>>>>> obtain >>>>>>>>> their memory. While this heap may occupy the largest portion of the >>>>>>>>> kernel's virtual address space, it cannot occupy the entirety of the >>>>>>>>> address >>>>>>>>> space. There are other things that must be given space within the >>>>>>>>> kernel's >>>>>>>>> address space, for example, the file system buffer map. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ZFS does not, however, use the regular file system buffer cache. The >>>>>>>>> ARC >>>>>>>>> takes its place, and the ARC abuses the kernel's heap like nothing >>>>>>>>> else. >>>>>>>>> So, if you are running a machine that only makes trivial use of a >>>>>>>>> non-ZFS >>>>>>>>> file system, like you boot from UFS, but store all of your data in >>>>>>>>> ZFS, >>>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>> you can dramatically reduce the size of the buffer map via boot >>>>>>>>> loader >>>>>>>>> tuneables and proportionately increase vm.kmem_size. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Any further increases in the kernel virtual address space size will, >>>>>>>>> however, require code changes. Small changes, but changes >>>>>>>>> nonetheless. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>>>> >>>> <<snip>> >>>>>>> Your objective should be to reduce the value of "sysctl >>>>>>> vfs.maxbufspace". >>>>>>> You can do this by setting the loader.conf tuneable "kern.maxbcache" >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> desired value. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What does your machine currently report for "sysctl vfs.maxbufspace"? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Here you go: >>>>>> vfs.maxbufspace: 54967025664 >>>>>> kern.maxbcache: 0 >>>>> >>>>> Try setting kern.maxbcache to two billion and adding 50 billion to the >>>>> setting of vm.kmem_size{,_max}. >>>>> >>> 2 : 50 ==>> is this the ratio for further tuning >>> kern.maxbcache:vm.kmem_size? Is kern.maxbcache also in bytes? >>> >> No, this is not a ratio. Yes, kern.maxbcache is in bytes. Basically, for >> every byte that you subtract from vfs.maxbufspace, through setting >> kern.maxbcache, you can add a byte to vm.kmem_size{,_max}. >> >> Alan >> > Great! Thanks. Are there other sysctls aside from vfs.bufspace that I > should monitor for vfs.maxbufspace usage? I just want to make sure > that vfs.maxbufspace is sufficient for our needs. You might keep an eye on "sysctl vfs.bufdefragcnt". If it starts rapidly increasing, you may want to increase vfs.maxbufspace. Alan _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"