Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Davide D'Amico <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:06:46 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.performance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Il 22/03/13 11:00, Traffanstead, Mike ha scritto: > May I ask why you're running ZFS on top of a RAID array? That's not > recommended. One of the advantages of ZFS is that it balance disk > activity across devices but when put it on top drives that at are > already raided it loses that insight and may end up scheduling > reads/writes that all land on the same device. The only case where > it's okay to do this is if you mirroring individual disks (e.g. > several RAID-1 devices) and even that's arguable. > Hi, we tried different approaches to a /DATA partition (before trying using a ZFS /DATAZFS partition): - an UFS partition (/DATA) on hardware raid10; - a ZFS on hardware raid10; - a ZFS mirror on two hardware stripes; The UFS filesystems performed at 400MBps without any tweak while ZFS performed at 400MBps after tweaks. So I don't think that these levels of performaces are related to file system. Thanks, d. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"