Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Davide D'Amico <[email protected]> Sat, 23 Mar 2013 08:44:31 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.performance |
|---|---|
| Organization | ContactLab |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Il 23.03.2013 01:34 Paul Pathiakis ha scritto: > Hi, > > There are several things about this that are highly suspect. > > First, wipe out the hardware RAID. The processor doing RAID > computation is, probably, MUCH slower than a core on the CPU. Even if > it's RAID-1 (Simple Mirror) this RAID card is performing tasks that is > does not need to do including replicating writes to two targets from > the controller or checking it's cache, battery, etc. If it's possible > to disable the onboard cache, do it. Hi Paul, thanks for your suggestions (some of them I've applied before starting any consideration, like disabling all on-disk caches or controller buffers) I'll try next monday. Anyway, the fact is that using the same hardware configuration (raid1+raid10) I saw that a centos 6.x outperformed freebsd 9.1. Another test I made yesterday was: on the same hardware I installed vmware esx 5.x and created a vm with centos inside it. The result was really impressive: the centos vm outperformed the 'real' freebsd 9.1 too and checking vmware performances graphs I didn't see any huge need for a massive throughput (I saw values from KBps to 10MBps), instead I saw a big use of CPU (using OLTP tests with a concurrency of 32 threads it's performaces began to slow down). I don't know is using some magic value for HZ or setting some trick with scheduler, I could gain something: I hope so, because I don't want to "pinguinate" my farm :) Thanks, d. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"