Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Daniel Bilik <[email protected]> Sun, 24 Mar 2013 10:36:48 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.performance |
|---|---|
| Organization | neosystem.cz |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 09:11:53 +0100 Davide D'Amico <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, I'll try tomorrow and I'll post results here. Some particular > parameter to use? Well, sysbench's "simple" is really simple ;-), it performs a single SELECTs (unlike "nontrx", which can be made to perform also writes). Table size you've chosen, 10M of rows, is IMHO reasonable, as it can be considered "big" table but at the same time it should fit into memory completely (so you don't unintentionally pull controller and/or disks into the picture). I would also recommend to disable query cache for the test, as it can influence the results for some test modes (and not only positively). -- Daniel Bilik neosystem.cz _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"