Re: Network performance comparison of DragonflyBSD, FreeBSD and Linux

--Sig_/Prd=PS.qhww8x3bKvpmO89F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Am Tue, 7 Mar 2017 02:14:44 +0100
Miroslav Lachman <[email protected]> schrieb:

> There is some comparison of DragonflyBSD, FreeBSD and two versions of=20
> Linux in specific network benchmark - HTTP/1.1 short lived connections.
> FreeBSD is the worst in this test.
>=20
> https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2017/03/06/19425.html
>=20
> https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/1K.png
> https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/8K.png
> https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/16K.png
>=20
> https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perf_cmp.pdf
>=20
> Miroslav Lachman
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd=
.org"

Thank you so much for this finding.

It is interesting that with a generic kernel, the "performance" is roughly =
the half of
what Linux and DFBSD would give.

I miss performance benchmarks, it seems, that over the past couple of years=
 this habit
has become quite unusual for FreeBSD.

Oliver

--=20
O. Hartmann

Ich widerspreche der Nutzung oder =C3=9Cbermittlung meiner Daten f=C3=BCr
Werbezwecke oder f=C3=BCr die Markt- oder Meinungsforschung (=C2=A7 28 Abs.=
 4 BDSG).

--Sig_/Prd=PS.qhww8x3bKvpmO89F
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iLUEARMKAB0WIQQZVZMzAtwC2T/86TrS528fyFhYlAUCWMGsawAKCRDS528fyFhY
lB5yAf9xO0rEAppHR8oJqy++gDNM3gamN+dKWun8GrtmHGYxP3TJtrLXcgCAi+ei
QebvJgYFlvO0EP03NDvu44NG3kSrAf0ZTrA0cikZjfDeVrc6dU4XsXzY0Uq7pQpk
lGamOK/NLd4hV1wYEylnGdce36MDI+tYBoh/EJDsifAAOWVLT5xU
=cE9z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/Prd=PS.qhww8x3bKvpmO89F--