graphics/jpeg-turbo vs graphics/jpeg

Moin,

es gibt diese beiden kokurrierenden ports, die wohl - wie ich das
verstehe - das gleiche leisten:

- graphics/jpeg-turbo
- graphics/jpeg

Ich habe graphics/jpeg installiert.

ich frage mich: WER traf dazu WANN die Entscheidung?!

ich kann mich nicht erinnern, das ich da einen der ports bewusst
selber installiert habe.


Meine Probleme mit cups-filers lassen mich ÃŒberlegen, ob jpeg-turbo
statt jpeg die wohl beheben können:

_________________________

configure: error: Package requirements (libqpdf >= 3.0.2) were not met:

Package 'libjpeg', required by 'libqpdf', not found

Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.

Alternatively, you may set the environment variables LIBQPDF_CFLAGS
and LIBQPDF_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
See the pkg-config man page for more details.
===>  Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.
Please report the problem to [email protected] [maintainer] and attach
the "/usr/ports/print/cups-filters/work/cups-filters-1.16.0/config.log"
including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be
a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system
(e.g. a /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static info -g -Ea).
*** Error code 1

Stop.
make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/print/cups-filters
*** Error code 1

Stop.
make: stopped in /usr/ports/print/cups-filters

===>>> make build failed for print/cups-filters
===>>> Aborting update


===>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command line:
       portmaster <flags> print/cups-filters 

This command has been saved to /tmp/portmasterfail.txt


__________________________


Heino


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected]
with "unsubscribe de-bsd-questions" in the body of the message