Re: pwd default behavior
Chris Hill <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.questions |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 6 Feb 2026, Jin Guojun[VFF] wrote: > On 2/6/26 08:30, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: >> Simon Wollwage <[email protected]> writes: >>> While reading the code for /bin/pwd, I noticed that the default behavior >>> in the code is to assume -P if no arguments are supplied, but according >>> to POSIX it shoud be -L >>> (https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/utilities/pwd.html) >>> >>> Is it for convenience reasons or other technical reasons? Seems like an >>> easy change to make it compliant. >> It makes very little difference in practice as pwd(1) is usually a shell >> built-in, but: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D55146 >> >> DES > > It does make some difference because one wants to know where one really is at > :-) > > Since there is another command "dirs" which does "pwd -L", so pwd defaulting > to -P makes sense to provide the real location. `dirs` exists in csh. In my shell, /bin/sh, there is no `dirs` and `pwd` defaults to the -L behavior. -- Chris Hill [email protected]