Re: Unable to boot after update from within auto-admin
linuxblood <[email protected]> Sat, 09 May 2026 11:46:49 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.questions |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <YF2ONJ1CsDOZWpWOwwZ1prHjwiRTJM4uQwjmYVZC0hkacV60z__UY0kHanoiLD0H-fKYYYGBmZvvXSR83OCuFbDsdLT_bo-LVI6btu9hL3o=@proton.me> |
On Saturday, May 9th, 2026 at 1:14 AM, Daniel Lysfjord <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2026-05-08 23:15, linuxblood wrote: > > I tried as you instructed. > > > > zpool import -a -N -l -o readonly=on > > > > it would output: > > > > -l is incompatible with -N > > > > I tried variations and eventually I got: > > > > No pools available to import > > > > I tried option after option... > > > > Then I tried zfs mount > > No pools, no "filesystems" to mount :( > > > > > and it wouldn't output anything but the LiveDVD would load for a couple > > of seconds and go back to the prompt. > > > > Regarding encryption, I chose whatever the default was using ZFS. I > > encrypted the install as well as the swap. > > > > I don't know what I should do here. If it's too complex I'll just > > reinstall, but I'm hoping I won't have to. > > > > Have you ever seen a popup about updates and it saying to run > > auto-admin? I'm still suspect about that popup, I don't know where it > > would've originated from. > > > > I have no idea about this auto-admin.. The git-page tells me it's an > automation framework Thanks. > If variations of zpool import -a fails, with no visible information > about "this pool needs to be imported by name" or something close to > that, I have no idea. To my untrained eye, it seems like the zpool > signature is unavailable.. That seems... unlikely, as zfs stores that in > multiple locations, and is pretty persistant in complaining if it finds > things that doesn't make sense. Thank you. Perhaps it had something to do with encryption? Ah, well... > > Regarding encryption, I chose whatever the default was using ZFS. I > > encrypted the install as well as the swap. > The default is no encryption, as it complicates setups by a whole lot. > If you chose the default, you did not choose encryption. If you chose to > encrypt the install and the swap, you did not choose the defaults, > and... tbh, I'm out of my confort zone:) I do use encrypted ZFS, both > native ZFS and ZFS on top of encrypted volumes, but that is so custom, > that trying to export that knowledge to whatever you have done, is of > little use.. Thanks, I won't use encryption the next time around. Lesson learned! > If you can't get the live DVD to even find your zpool, I'm not much of > help to you, and, from my point of view, you might aswell do a > reinstall.. That sounds good, I appreciate your help more than you know! > Pro-tip for the future: /home and everything else should be separated:) Gotcha, thanks. I appreciate the verbose details, honesty, humility and kindness from both you and Mark G. I am dedicated to using FreeBSD and I will enjoy the journey, and enjoy it ever so more with people so wonderful as yourselves here to help.