Re: RightAlt Key behaviour (was: Bug in "Edit")
Alain <[email protected]> Fri, 1 Nov 2002 22:06:17 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freedos.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Aitor, > Just one thing: for a long time, some people believed that this is a bug > on xkeyb, but it proved to be a bug in Edit. ;-) > Along the same lines, I have been made this request as a possible with > for xkeyb: make RightAlt behave "as leftAlt", or as I understood, making > RightAlt behave as LeftAlt, as (I was told) happens in US style keyboards. > I don't quite understand what I am being requested, I think the idea is > that one could trigger the menus by pressing RightAlt+F, not only > LeftAlt+F. Bearing in mind that this would automatically disable the > "third character in a key" feature, I can't get what I am supposed to > do. As I understand it, if a program wants to check the Alt-pressing > status, it would look in the appropriate BIOS variables (0040h:0017h, > 0040h:0096h, etc), so as I see it, there's nothing I can do about this, > unless this means that my int9h has to cheat BIOS and tell that LeftAlt > was pressed whenever RightAlt was pressed... I don't know where the request comen from, but I can point that: 1) RightAlt was introduced lated (in AT) and can only be checked independently with the extended interface. Both keys _should_ set the same bit in the standard interface, but it has a few bug sometimes. 2) small keyboards don't _have_ a RightAlt. BUT some people write sw believing that every machine is just like theirs and will never change. If you have a sw that says RightAlt+Y and your keyboard just doesn't have it? Alain