| Newsgroups |
gmane.os.freedos.devel |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Bart Oldeman wrote:
> > Never mind. It is not worth the trouble (the problem is probably with the
> > patches applied to the final binary). IMHO the only worthy effort
> > would be to compile it with OpenWatcom because it has no redistribution
> > limitation.
And it has no final license still:
"the final form of this license may well change"
from http://www.openwatcom.org/license_info/open_watcom_lic.html
> > For now it is quite ok to have a link to Borland's museum, but
> > what if they remove it from there? On the other side, some of us (including
> > myself) have licenced BC31. Just thinking aloud...
I do develop FreeCOM using BC5, in regards of the DOS-support by the
compiler itself I do not know any enhancements since BC3.1, so I suppose
it's working -- well why should it work with TC1.01 and BC5, but not with
BC3.1??
You have to re-compile SUPPL, of course.
Bye,
--
Steffen Kaiser
The current maintainer of [email protected]
http://freedos.sourceforge.net/freecom/FreeCOM.html