Re: UMB and 386/486 --> status of FreeDOS emm386 etc.

tom ehlert <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freedos.devel,gmane.spam.detected
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> Hi, I did not want to humiliate Tom, but the fact that it took him
> so long to do the changes HE wanted suggest that it will take long
> for ANYBODY to add the changes WE want (VCPI, > 64 MB). Protected
> mode is just a tricky bussiness.

protected mode is tricky business.
LARGE assembler programs are tricky.
living in a debug-free environment is tricky.

 
> That the emm386 on which Tom's is based ran mostly as TSR is interesting
> to know, maybe FreeDOS emm386 can also become TSRable then.

what the hell would be the purpose of that?
TSR is *trivial* to to, compared with items above.


> Of course, Windows and Linux and ... are more MEANT to be 32bit, but
> BOOT Wine), I have no problems with being happy about 16/32bit DPMI
> software running with plain DOS.

may I suggest to use linux?

> If you do not want to reboot dozens of times during driver development,
> I recomment www.DOSEMU.org 

I recommend WinNT/2K/XP, or LINUX.


tom
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.