Re: UMB and 386/486 --> status of FreeDOS emm386 etc.
tom ehlert <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freedos.devel,gmane.spam.detected |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Hi, I did not want to humiliate Tom, but the fact that it took him > so long to do the changes HE wanted suggest that it will take long > for ANYBODY to add the changes WE want (VCPI, > 64 MB). Protected > mode is just a tricky bussiness. protected mode is tricky business. LARGE assembler programs are tricky. living in a debug-free environment is tricky. > That the emm386 on which Tom's is based ran mostly as TSR is interesting > to know, maybe FreeDOS emm386 can also become TSRable then. what the hell would be the purpose of that? TSR is *trivial* to to, compared with items above. > Of course, Windows and Linux and ... are more MEANT to be 32bit, but > BOOT Wine), I have no problems with being happy about 16/32bit DPMI > software running with plain DOS. may I suggest to use linux? > If you do not want to reboot dozens of times during driver development, > I recomment www.DOSEMU.org I recommend WinNT/2K/XP, or LINUX. tom