Re: Re: installation problems

Eric Auer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freedos.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi all, I have a project proposal!

The FreeDOS kernel is called kernel.sys
The FreeDOS kernel loads fdconfig.sys, not config.sys, if both exist.
You can use another file instead of autoexec.bat by specifying (in *config.sys)
  SHELL=COMMAND.COM /P /K AUTOFD.BAT
(do not forget to write the path of command.com as well, if needed:
  SHELL=C:\FreeDos\bin\command.com c:\freedos\bin /e:512 /p /k autofd.bat )

Conclusion:
If we had a boot sector that could load either the MS Windows kernel or the
FreeDOS kernel, we could install FreeDOS and Win9x (or any FAT-using Windows,
even MS DOS) on the same drive and select which one to boot at boot time :-).
I mean, without the need to use LILO.

Alternatively, a standard DOS bootmanager that can pick one bootsector out of
a choice list will do the same (but cost 2 sectors diskspace more ;-)).

What DOS bootmanager would you suggest? Anybody wanting to write such an
integrated "FreeDOS/Win DUAL bootsector"?

Eric
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.