Re: Re: installation problems
Eric Auer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freedos.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all, I have a project proposal! The FreeDOS kernel is called kernel.sys The FreeDOS kernel loads fdconfig.sys, not config.sys, if both exist. You can use another file instead of autoexec.bat by specifying (in *config.sys) SHELL=COMMAND.COM /P /K AUTOFD.BAT (do not forget to write the path of command.com as well, if needed: SHELL=C:\FreeDos\bin\command.com c:\freedos\bin /e:512 /p /k autofd.bat ) Conclusion: If we had a boot sector that could load either the MS Windows kernel or the FreeDOS kernel, we could install FreeDOS and Win9x (or any FAT-using Windows, even MS DOS) on the same drive and select which one to boot at boot time :-). I mean, without the need to use LILO. Alternatively, a standard DOS bootmanager that can pick one bootsector out of a choice list will do the same (but cost 2 sectors diskspace more ;-)). What DOS bootmanager would you suggest? Anybody wanting to write such an integrated "FreeDOS/Win DUAL bootsector"? Eric