Re: proxy memory objects
[email protected] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) 21 Nov 2002 19:02:59 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.hurd.devel.readers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Marcus Brinkmann <[email protected]> writes: > However, I think I will change the function name of the hack to > mach_create_memory_object_proxy, to illustrate the target of the RPC better > and leave the memory_object_* name space to the memory object (and control) > interface. Yes, I think this is the right strategy. So we need two additional interfaces, one called mach_create_memory_object_proxy, and one called memory_object_create_proxy.