Re: Potential use case for opaque space bank: domain factored network stack
Pierre THIERRY <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.hurd.l4 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Scribit Marcus Brinkmann dies 06/01/2007 hora 20:26: > The principle is user's control over their resources, or short "user > freedom". Well, with respect to classical law, in your scenario the user has less freedom and control over it's own resources, because you give him the /usus/, the right to use it, but you refuse him the right to give exclusive /usus/ to someone else. That's a basic freedom in real life, and it's pretty useful in some very interesting schemes in OS implementation. > In the total dominance case, the relationship of control over the > resources remains the same before and after the operation. In the > peer case, it is altered, that's a threat scenario for me. It's not really altered, because the originating peer keeps the /abusus/, which gives him the ability to get back to the exact state of control it was before. Freely, Pierre -- [email protected] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFoATDxe13INnVDYoRAhwtAJwPjJmD6LbSU3ZkgLISOvrZ9uSS8wCfVRGV 5mA077AR7OPvvS5KBp6HqR0= =4p0X -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----