Re: Potential use case for opaque space bank: domain factored network stack
Pierre THIERRY <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.hurd.l4 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Scribit Marcus Brinkmann dies 06/01/2007 hora 23:48: > > It's not really altered, because the originating peer keeps the > > /abusus/, which gives him the ability to get back to the exact state > > of control it was before. > That doesn't make the loss of control any less real for the duration > it happened, with all its consequences for the actors involved (which > may very well be irreversible and thus permanent). What can be permanent with opaque memory that wouldn't with memory shared transparently? The only permanent change in the process is that the memory region could be altered, but that's already the case whatever the way memory is shared. Curiously, Pierre -- [email protected] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFoC2bxe13INnVDYoRAoQ/AKDwr1ROe6Ftwmp0ecH+0bA90GsZcQCfXIQt /2sgfQXD+zYDyXbL4RWIix0= =uOiG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----