Re: Alternative network stack design (was: Re: Potential use case for opaque space bank: domain factored network stack

"Jonathan S. Shapiro" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.hurd.l4
Organization The EROS Group, LLC
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 00:51 +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> At Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:01:51 -0500,
> "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > This sounds like you intend to have all network buffers owned by the
> > network subsystem. If so, you have re-invented denial of service.
> > 
> > Could you clarify whether this is the case?
> 
> I don't think so.  The effect of the proposal is intended to be the
> following: Pages can be "tagged" so that they can be made opaque by
> certain designated (and thus authorized) subsystems only.  Ownership
> of the resource remains within the party who did the tagging.  I think
> that this description catches the main idea.

This begins to smell like dead fish. What this proposal is saying is:

  We think that opaque pages are bad for some reason, but we
  can't find a clean way to get rid of them and do effective
  resource accounting, so we are restricting their use to the
  Hurd-NG gods.

How is this position any different from RIAA restricting my use of
music?

-- 
Jonathan S. Shapiro, Ph.D.
Managing Director
The EROS Group, LLC
+1 443 927 1719 x5100
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.