Re: Alternative network stack design

Tom Bachmann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.hurd.l4
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Marcus Brinkmann schrieb:
> The decision which processes can access a tagged resource with extra
> privileges would be made by the processes doing the tagging according
> to its security policy.

How is that different from a design where every process can hand out
intransparent memory (that is, memory the process can only reclaim, not
inspect)? Wouldn't your design introduce all the harmful properties it
tries to abolish in the first place?
- --
- -ness-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFolpFvD/ijq9JWhsRAsSHAJ9bifmdJus2yLY68OE7SXF8ubzsbACfX9EK
l55rXsWQyEMhxc+TkgORHqw=
=Y/Fk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.