To Pierre

Anton Tagunov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.hurd.l4
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Pierre

PSD   = proprietary software/data
PSDV  = PSD vendor
Chip  = TPM chip
Owner = PC owner
Key   = a cryptographic key

Marcus> Jonathan proposes that we make a paradigm shift in who controls the
Marcus> computational resources of a machine.  Instead of giving this 
control
Marcus> to the rightful owner of the device, he wants to give this 
control to
Marcus> the authors of the programs and data that is put into these 
machines.

Pierre> How is this related to the issue of opaque memory?
Pierre> The availibility of opaque memory without ... doesn't undermine ...
Pierre> the control of the rightful owner of the device.

Chip + "non-free" OS do undermine Owner's control:

PSDV encrypts PSD with Key
PSDV communicates Key to Chip
Chip allows Key to be used by "proper"
unmodified .exe on "proper" OS only

The solution is to build a Free OS so popular
that PSDV shall be forced to support it

=======

Pierre> blackbox algorithms don't require opaque memory

Pierre, I'm extremely interested. Could you tell more? I've assumed
RIAA needs both "non-free" OS + Chip to enforce real DRM

Anton
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.