To Pierre
Anton Tagunov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.hurd.l4 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Pierre PSD = proprietary software/data PSDV = PSD vendor Chip = TPM chip Owner = PC owner Key = a cryptographic key Marcus> Jonathan proposes that we make a paradigm shift in who controls the Marcus> computational resources of a machine. Instead of giving this control Marcus> to the rightful owner of the device, he wants to give this control to Marcus> the authors of the programs and data that is put into these machines. Pierre> How is this related to the issue of opaque memory? Pierre> The availibility of opaque memory without ... doesn't undermine ... Pierre> the control of the rightful owner of the device. Chip + "non-free" OS do undermine Owner's control: PSDV encrypts PSD with Key PSDV communicates Key to Chip Chip allows Key to be used by "proper" unmodified .exe on "proper" OS only The solution is to build a Free OS so popular that PSDV shall be forced to support it ======= Pierre> blackbox algorithms don't require opaque memory Pierre, I'm extremely interested. Could you tell more? I've assumed RIAA needs both "non-free" OS + Chip to enforce real DRM Anton