Re: To Jonathan [backdoor]

Anton Tagunov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.hurd.l4
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Anton>    I've got an anti-hijack system in my car.
Anton>    there's a 10 minute emergency procedure.

Jonathan> What prevents a hijacker to use that procedure?

A combination of factors:

* he needs to find the hidden button
* to know the exact procedure
* to break the console so that he would be able to touch
   ignition wires together the needed number of times
   (it's part of the procedure)
* to have 10 minutes of time - after he's already broken the console!
* Also the alarm emits funny sounds as he waits

I think every anti-hijack system manual I've seen mentioned a variation of this.

Anton>   P.S. The talk is about *safe defaults* actually.

Pierre>  I think the backdoor is an *unsafe* default, actually.

You're quite right.

We should decide what is more dangerous to an average Joe:
data loss/vendor lock-in or data disclosure?

However I ask you to kindly wait for my next mail.
I'll describe my backdoor design in detail.
Then we shall discuss a proposal not an abstraction.

cheers,
Anton
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.