Re: To Jonathan [backdoor]
"Harri Haataja" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.hurd.l4 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/01/07, Jonathan S. Shapiro <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 00:56 +0300, Anton Tagunov wrote: > > A> Jonathan if you could build an utmostly secure OS > > A> yet having an inspection "backdoor" what would you do? > > > > J> Without any hesitation whatsoever I would leave out the back door. > > J> The problem with a back door is that it will not be used for emergency > > J> purposes. It will be used primarily by everyday administrators and > > J> companies for improper purposes. > > > > Very good point. Let me think for a while. > > I want to imagine a back door that shall be not be abused. > > Can we design one? Please let us not be fast to judge. > > People have been trying to do that since the first multiuser computer. > No sign of hope so far. Well, there are some that rely on physical security. Like options to bootloaders or access keylocks in rs6k's etc. -- I appear to be temporarily using gmail's horrible interface. I apologise for any failure in my part in trying to make it do the right thing with post formatting.