Re: Translucency counterexample
Pierre THIERRY <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.hurd.l4 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Scribit Anton Tagunov dies 12/01/2007 hora 12:22: > If any process is able to check "identity" of other process it can > refuse to work with replacement implementation right? For that it needs to receive appropriate authority, so if the program is installed in a way that it receives such bootstrapping trust information by it's parent that gives him a capability to the alternative implementation, it won't be able to tell it's not the original, AFAICT. Supposedly, Pierre -- [email protected] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFp1N/xe13INnVDYoRAhcaAJ9IHrxhK7fQafGdYaKSJ0ly7KTPVwCeIXhg fuobk9KcowiEi9tckzOKb+Y= =FM3O -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----